, , , , , , , , ,

The Queen of Hearts wasn't at all squeamish about chopping off heads. If she were three-dimensional, I can guarantee you, Simplia would be terrified of her. In two-d, though, she just thinks the queen looks silly. Illustration by John Tenniel

The Queen of Hearts wasn’t at all squeamish about capital punishment. If she were three-dimensional, I  guarantee you, Simplia would be terrified of her. In two-d, though, Simplia just thinks the queen looks silly. For terror, Simplia finds no one more terrifying than the Wizard of Oz.  Illustration by John Tenniel

All afternoon, unaware of the falling, drifting snow, Simplia had been pivoting her head first one way, then the other, attentive to the volley of opinion and observation put forth by the Magical Friends hunkered around the fireplace at the Fairy Tale Lobby. Their conversation was peppered with lively examples of how, yes indeed they had altered traditional stories to suit themselves or to better suit their audiences.

Somebody from storytellerscampfire  stirred the embers in the fireplace to life. Simplia couldn’t see a face, but she heard the voice loud and clear:

I’ve been giving the ‘ner do wells in many a story life sentences in the
dungeon recently- commuting their death sentences… “Off with his head”
has become a disturbing and all to real image lately and I don’t want to in
any way normalize it.

Tarkabarka jumped in without missing a beat:

Depends on the audience. A lot of psychologists say that kids need closure, and until it is sure the villain will never ever come back (is dead), they will feel anxiety after the story ends. They also say that kids don’t imagine or process the villain dying as adults do (they don’t imagine the gore or the reality of it, just like with Little Red being devoured). … With that said, I can see where you are coming from and I am struggling with this too. In Hungarian folktales there are endings that say “the wicked queen was so angry that her plan failed that she dropped dead.” (or popped like a balloon, which kids find endlessly funny). …Ultimately it’s up to the storyteller, and depends on the audience :) Closure is the important thing.

storycraftersx2 had something to add on the matter of closure:

We told an old story that is new to our tongues the other day. Traditionally, it ends with death for the nasty character. Because our audience for that piece is younger, we don’t go off on the brutalities of that (no dancing to death in iron hot shoes or soaking in tar or anything); yet we honor the intent of the traditional work. We give a gentle picture of her circumstances (becoming lost in a storm) and say that she was ‘never seen again.’ …
So, a wise young one in the front row, upon hearing that the ‘witch’ was never seen again cried out, “She was really gone, wasn’t she?” Yes, indeed she was. …(A)ll that psychological research was borne out in one child’s triumphant realization that the story evil was truly vanquished.
Death in such stories is symbolic. And symbols work wonders.

Marion Leeper had an unusual take on the issue:

When I was about 10 years old, I went with my parents to see a production of Macbeth which turned out to be particularly gruesome. But not long into the play, I suddenly realised I knew the story. I’d been told a fairly mild version of it by my teacher. Knowing what was happening next made it safe for me to watch the play without getting too scared.

“Yes!” said Simplia. “I remember being so terrified of some stories that I put them down, turned them off, ran away from them… and never picked them up again. I wonder now what I’ve missed out on?”

Sagacia nodded. “Yeah. Sometimes suspense is as terrifying as anything else in an intense story. Knowing what to expect ahead of time can help a person insulate themselves ahead of time.”

“…instead of getting startled and terrified at the same time.”

Coming at the issue from yet another angle, Cathy Jo Smith said:

The first time I read “The Vicious Fairies” in Eddie Lenihan’s “Meeting the Other Crowd” (a traditional Irish tale), I was appalled. In it, the Fair Folk are told that on the Day of Judgment, they will only see the face of God if one drop of blood can be found in their veins. But they have no blood, as such; they are cursed forever, not for their actions but for their identity, for what they are, not who they are. I couldn’t accept that this was considered a “Christian” story; it wasn’t the way I was raised to understand the religion.
So I wrote a new ending–the human, realizing what he thought was good news was really a curse, cuts his own hand and offers it “blood brother” style–offering that ‘drop of blood’ as he feels Jesus would. And yes, I tell my listeners what I changed and why.
…they have heard an original twist on an old tale. I hope that satisfied both the traditionalist and Muse.

Just as Simplia was about to emit a heartfelt “amen!” Lance Foster hollered across the room:

I like your new version :-) Some say that the intermarriage of fairy and human was also an attempt to put our blood in their veins as well as vice versa.

Sagacia had actually put down her knitting while all this back and forth was going back and forth. Simplia leaned over and whispered to her, “I think my brain is full. They’re not done talking yet, but my brain …”

“Yeah, I know,” said Sagacia. “What a great conversation! And look! There’s a little gnome in the corner… See there. In the shadows where no one can see him. With quill pen and parchment. He’s writing furiously. I think he’s taking dictation. And, look! He just winked at us. Maybe tomorrow or next week he’ll let us see what everybody else has to say.”

Simplia yawned and said, “I hope so. I need to get my boots on and trudge off to bed.”